Understanding how to tell if art is AI generated can be a valuable skill. Two primary methods include using specific apps designed for this purpose and identifying visual anomalies that are common in AI-generated images.
The 'AI or Not' app, created by Optic, is a useful tool for determining whether an artwork is human-made or AI-created. This free, browser-based image checker works with various AI art generators such as Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, GAN, and DALL-E 2.
Here’s how the app performs with different types of images:
Image TypeAI or Not App ResultQuick character sketch in ProcreateHuman-createdSketch created by prompts in DALL-E 2AI-generatedPaint-over of an AI-generated image with Procreate brush strokesAI-generated
The app accurately identifies both straightforward AI-generated images and those that have been modified. This makes it a reliable tool for anyone looking to distinguish between human and AI art.
Another effective way to identify AI-generated images is by looking for visual anomalies. These are distortions or imperfections that occur due to the limitations of machine learning algorithms during the creation process. Common visual anomalies include:
For example, AI-generated portraits often struggle with symmetry, resulting in uneven eyes or other facial features. Similarly, teeth in AI images may appear unnatural or misshapen. By observing these anomalies, one can often determine the origin of the artwork.
Understanding these characteristics can help in distinguishing AI-generated art from human-created pieces.
One of the key indicators of AI-generated art is the presence of watermarks and labeling. Many stock photo agencies and AI image-generating apps require contributors to label AI-generated images clearly. This labeling often appears in the image title, description, and tags, making it easier to identify AI-generated images when browsing through catalogs.
Additionally, many AI image-generating apps apply watermarks to the images created with their technology, especially for users with free accounts. These watermarks can vary in form, from company logos to text indicating the use of AI. Some watermarks are more subtle, such as a string of colored squares positioned at the bottom right corner of the image.
The issue of copyright and legality presents a significant challenge when it comes to AI-generated art. Currently, there is no universally accepted standard for copyrighting AI-generated images. The existing legal framework generally indicates that AI-generated images are not copyrightable, primarily because they lack human authorship.
This lack of copyright protection poses various concerns, particularly when AI technology is used to manipulate real-life images. The results can often be highly realistic and believable, leading to potential misinformation or the creation of fake events. Such risks underscore the importance of critically evaluating the sources of digital images.
Understanding these characteristics can help in effectively discerning whether an image is AI-generated.
Identifying AI-generated art can be quite challenging, especially given the rapid advancements in AI technology. There are several misconceptions and factors that affect the ability to recognize AI-produced images.
According to recent surveys, many individuals struggle to identify AI-generated images accurately. In some survey groups, as many as 87% of respondents mistook an AI-generated image for a real photo of a person. Interestingly, respondents who felt confident about their answers had worse results than those who weren’t so sure.
Moreover, two-thirds of people who think they would recognize a chatbot struggle with identifying AI-generated texts. Younger respondents are generally more adept at recognizing AI-generated images compared to Millennials, Gen X, or Baby Boomers.
Several factors can affect the recognition of AI-generated art. One significant factor is the type of image. AI-modified images of people are more difficult to recognize than images generated by AI from scratch. This is likely because modifications can be subtle and blend seamlessly with the original image.
Another factor is the experience and familiarity of the viewer with AI technology. Younger individuals, often more tech-savvy, tend to recognize AI-generated art more accurately. This could be due to their higher exposure to digital platforms and AI tools.
AI is making waves in various art forms, including writing, translation, music composition, and performance. Understanding how AI integrates into these fields can help in distinguishing AI-generated content.
AI is increasingly used in writing and translation. AI models like GPT-3 can produce coherent text that mimics human writing. However, there are subtle signs that can help identify AI-generated text.
In a survey, respondents were asked to identify AI-generated translations. For instance, John Ormsby's 1885 translation of "Don Quixote" was mistaken for AI by 66% of respondents. The text seemed illogical and awkward. Conversely, AI-translated excerpts from "One Hundred Years of Solitude" convinced 62% of people that they were human-generated.
AI's role in music composition and performance is expanding. AI can compose music by analyzing patterns and styles from existing songs, making it challenging to distinguish between AI and human compositions.
Most respondents found music to be the hardest category to differentiate between AI and human-generated content. An EDM track arranged by a human producer was identified as AI-generated by 71.4% of respondents. Conversely, an AI-composed song, trained on Beatles tracks and performed by musicians, convinced 61.6% of people that it was human-made.
AI is transforming multiple art forms, making it essential to understand how to tell if art is AI-generated.